Hello everyone.
I am not sure why but I understand some of you have had issues trying to post comments to this blog. I have double checked the settings and there should not be an issue. However, should you still encounter problems please take a moment to tell me about it on our Facebook
page.https://www.facebook.com/pages/Guerrilla-Trivia/293686580665729
We hope you are enjoying the Daily Challenge and keep an eye out for more stuff coming soon.
Thursday, February 7, 2013
Monday, January 28, 2013
All Things Are Relative
“All things are relative.”Or..so the sages would have us believe.
I once had a teacher who loved to say, “All things are as they should be.” (However, a close friend tells everyone he meets, that the word “Should"...‘should’ be removed from our language, since it just causes angst and anger among those of us who over-use it.)
Here are some example, in my opinion, of things that just “shouldn’t” be...or are "as they should be."
1. Do you know that not one single every produced and released by the Beatles, has ever sold more copies than “Tik-Tok” by Ke$ha? This was her debut single. Here’s where the “all things are relative” comes into play. There are more people “acquiring” (including ‘purchasing’) music today, than in the late ‘60’s – therefore numbers can be relative. But, God help me…more than any Beatle’s single? This just seems against the laws of nature.
2. In 2012, one out of every seven Americans had at least 10 credit cards. Are you kidding me?! With all the hue and cry about the economy, it appears that lots of people haven’t either felt enough pain…or…they are continue the personal laissez-faire financial attitude that helped drive us off the fiscal cliff.
Considering that these millions of American don’t see how they are trivializing their own finances, I therefore think this fact falls in the trivia category.
3. NY Yankee first baseman, Joe Pepitone (the first professional ballplayer to bring a hair dyer into the clubhouse) was born in Brooklyn on October 9, 1940. Big deal? However, another baby born on the same day, across the pond in Liverpool, UK, turned out to be John Lennon (the first pop singer to be assassinated).
Now that’s an interesting coincidence. Or, perhaps it is “as it should be.”
4. Most people know that Edgar Allen Poe
is associated with dark themes, death and lost love. He’s considered the originator of the detective crime novel. But, few – even deep admirers – know that he was considered somewhat of an expert on sea shells. due to a constant need for money, Poe produced an updated adaptation “A Manual of Conchology,” that was released in 1839, under the title “The Conchologist’s First Book.”
For his effort, Poe was paid $50. In today's economy, that would be worth $1,190.50.
Poe’s novel, “The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym” (which was never very popular) gives readers insight into his love of sea shells. And Poe followers have found a mild influence (by the novel) on Herman Melville’s “Moby Dick.
Mr. Poe seems to have been more than a heavy drinking novelist and poet who lived in the dark shadows in which his characters typically resided. He also worked in "other" modes of expression, to pay the bills. He might have been the Jack Kerouac of his day. But, like modern writers, there is more to them, than their popular novels. J.D. Salinger worked as the entertainment director of a cruise line. Kurt Vonnegut managed a car dealership for Saab. And, John Steinbeck hated his work as a construction worker on Madison Square Garden.
5. Did you know that zucchini isn’t a vegetable? Now, what it is came as a verbal surprise. I didn’t expect to hear/read the following. It is actually an immature fruit – the swollen ovary of the zucchini flower. Well…OK. I can live with that.
Speaking of food, what’s with the ever-growing number of reality TV cooking shows? My wife won’t appreciate this, but the cooking programs, while they allow cat fights to occur between warring chefs (or chef wannabes), that often display down-and-dirty back-stabbing and self-acclaimed ego dysfunction leading to melt-downs and sobbing, the food produced is a hell of a lot more entertaining and intellectually mouth watering than anything Project Runway produces.
So…what are the top 5 reality cooking shows (as of January 2013)? Is it “Hell’s Kitchen,” “Iron Chef America,” “Sweet Genius,” “Top Chef,” “MasterChef,” “The Next Iron Chef,” “Chopped,” or “Restaurant Wars?”
Yes, we listed 8. Three didn’t make the top 5 list.
Here goes:
#1 goes to “Top Chef.” The Quickfire and Elimination challenges are very popular with viewers. Winners can walk away with $200,000 and a feature in “Food & Wine Magazine.”
#2 on the list is “MasterChef,” which features amateur cooks. Starting off with 100 wannabe chefs, who prepare what they call their signature dishes, only 14 make the final competition. Three judges, including Joe Bastianich, Graham Ellio and the infamous (yet sedated) Gordon Ramsay, make the final decision.
#3 goes to the often-wild “Hell’s Kitchen.” If you’re into verbal abuse and lots of “bleeping out” of cuss words, this is the show for you. Gordon Ramsay runs a tight ship with brutal truths – even devastating assessments that leave competing aspiring chefs in the dust – and on the floor.
#4 on the list is “The Next Iron Chef.” It appears the student has surpassed the teacher. While a spin-off of “Iron Chef America,” this show has moved its parent to a lower position on this list. Two contesting chefs go head-to-head in “Kitchen Stadium,” coming up with recipes that often include some off-the-wall key ingredients.
And finally…there is the #5 TV cooking shows. And the honor goes to ”Chopped.” If you recall the reality show, “Queer Eye for the Straight Guy,” you’ll recognize the host of “Chopped” – Ted Allen. Starting out with four chefs, elimination rounds, revolving around mystery ingredients in wicker baskets, provide enough culinary challenges and opportunities for one winner to eventually emerge. Each episode features all new contesting chefs, who prepare their dishes for a panel of three experienced chefs and food reviewers.![]()
The other shows mentioned, didn’t make the Top 5 List. Who cares?! I don't. Maybe you do. I find too many of these shows seem frightenly similar. Perhaps they are all “relative,” and their repetitiveness “as it should be.” But I find them a definition of hell.
- - - -
Just a few thoughts. They be "as they should be," or perhaps they "shouldn't" have happened. I’ve been wrong before. But, I do know that they are trivial.
Wednesday, January 2, 2013
Happy New Year from GT
Picking
the “Person of the Year” Isn’t All that Easy or Flawless
Happy
New Year! We at Guerrilla Trivia wish you and yours the very best for a great
2013.
Back
in 1927, TIME magazine initiated a tradition that has survived criticism and
adulation. The first selection of “Man of the Year” was the young dashing
pilot, Charles Lindbergh. Over the years, the selections have typically been a
single person. However, groups and multiple individuals have been chosen.
So…many
Americans were pleased to see President Barack Obama selected as the TIME “Person
of the Year” (for the second time). Of
course, there were plenty who weren’t. You can’t please everyone.
It
must be a tough job, filtering out pros and cons, trying to fathom successes
and failures, deciding who fits the definition of what qualifies one to be that
special person. So, what are the
qualifications?
Back
in 2001, Jim Kelly, TIME editor, interviewed on the Web, gave this classic
definition of who qualifies: “…the person who most
affected the events of the year, for better or for worse.” In 1938, Adolf Hiter
made the cover (published Jan. 2, 1939) “before all his crimes became known to
the world. When Hitler made ‘Man of the Year,’ the illustration was of him
playing the Organ of Death with skeletons all over it. It was not meant to be
an honor to Hitler. The reaction to it was surprisingly mute.”
The selection of the Ayatollah Khomeini
in 1979 was controversial, and a few hundred people canceled their
subscriptions. Women have been Person of the Year: Wallace Warfield-Simpson,
who married the King of England; Queen Elizabeth has been Woman of the Year;
Madame Chaing Kai-Shek and Cori Aquino also made the cut. In 1975, all American
Women were the choice.
Here’s the list of the chosen few:
1927
|
Charles
Augustus Lindbergh
|
1928
|
Walter P.
Chrysler
|
1929
|
Owen D.
Young
|
1930
|
Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi
|
1931
|
Pierre
Laval
|
1932
|
|
1933
|
Hugh
Samuel Johnson
|
1934
|
|
1935
|
Haile
Selassie
|
1936
|
|
1937
|
Generalissimo
& Mme Chiang Kai-Shek
|
1938
|
|
1939
|
Joseph
Stalin
|
1940
|
Winston
Leonard Spencer Churchill
|
1941
|
|
1942
|
Joseph
Stalin
|
1943
|
George
Catlett Marshall
|
1944
|
Dwight
David Eisenhower
|
1945
|
Harry
Truman
|
1946
|
James F.
Byrnes
|
1947
|
George
Catlett Marshall
|
1948
|
Harry
Truman
|
1949
|
|
1950
|
American
Fighting-Man
|
1951
|
Mohammed
Mossadegh
|
1952
|
Elizabeth
II
|
1953
|
Konrad
Adenauer
|
1954
|
John
Foster Dulles
|
1955
|
Harlow
Herbert Curtice
|
1956
|
Hungarian
Freedom Fighter
|
1957
|
Nikita
Krushchev
|
1958
|
Charles
De Gaulle
|
1959
|
Dwight
David Eisenhower
|
1960
|
U.S.
Scientists
|
1961
|
John
Fitzgerald Kennedy
|
1962
|
Pope John
XXIII
|
1963
|
Martin
Luther King Jr.
|
1964
|
Lyndon B.
Johnson
|
1965
|
General
William Childs Westmoreland
|
1966
|
Twenty-Five
and Under
|
1967
|
Lyndon B.
Johnson
|
1968
|
Astronauts
Anders, Borman and Lovell
|
1969
|
The
Middle Americans
|
1970
|
Willy
Brandt
|
1971
|
Richard
Milhous Nixon
|
1972
|
Nixon and
Kissinger
|
1973
|
John J.
Sirica
|
1974
|
King
Faisal
|
1975
|
American
Women
|
1976
|
Jimmy
Carter
|
1977
|
Anwar
Sadat
|
1978
|
Teng
Hsiao-P'ing
|
1979
|
Ayatullah
Khomeini
|
1980
|
|
1981
|
Lech
Walesa
|
1982
|
The
Computer
|
1983
|
Ronald Reagan & Yuri Andropov
|
1984
|
Peter
Ueberroth
|
1985
|
Deng
Xiaoping
|
1986
|
Corazon
Aquino
|
1987
|
|
1988
|
Endangered
Earth
|
1989
|
|
1990
|
The Two
George Bushes
|
1991
|
Ted
Turner
|
1992
|
Bill
Clinton
|
1993
|
The
Peacemakers
|
1994
|
Pope John
Paul II
|
1995
|
Newt
Gingrich
|
1996
|
Dr. David
Ho
|
1997
|
Andy
Grove
|
1998
|
Bill
Clinton and Kenneth Starr
|
1999
|
Jeff
Bezos
|
2000
|
George W.
Bush
|
2001
|
Rudolph
Giuliani
|
2002
|
The
Whistleblowers
|
2003
|
The
American Soldier
|
2004
|
George W.
Bush
|
2005
|
Bill
Gates, Melinda Gates, & Bono
|
2006
|
You
|
2007
|
Vladimir
Putin
|
2008
|
Barack
Obama
|
2009
|
Ben
Bernanke
|
2010
|
Mark
Zuckerberg
|
Did
you notice which U.S. Presidents made it twice?
How
quickly we all forget. Do you remember the cover selection for 2011?
Who
would have been your choice for 2012?
Thursday, June 28, 2012
George Armstrong Custer – A Few Guerrilla Trivia Perspectives:
Described as hard driving and hard headed, George Armstrong Custer was also known dunderhead. Is that a fair description? Let’s look at a few events and facts. You can make your own conclusion – the Lord knows: historians have reached all kinds of conclusions about him.
As the son of an Ohio blacksmith, George lived a sparse existence. He actually met, Elizabeth, his future wife, while attending a school near the home of an aunt he was sent to live with, when his family couldn’t afford to support him. Elizabeth’s father, Judge Bacon, permitted George to work odd jobs around his property, but never permitted the boy into his home. Later, when George wanted to be a lawyer, the necessary funds weren’t available, so he got himself an appointment to the U.S. Military Academy at West Point.
He still had to pass the entrance exam, when he arrived at West Point in June, 1857. At the time, there were 107 other cadet candidates, but after taking the exam, more than one third of the young men were eliminated. Along with 67 survivors, George began his undignified stint at the school. By the time he graduated in 1861, there were only 34 cadets left – and he ranked 34th. Not too distinguishing.
When the Civil War began, Custer was with General George Brinton McClellan’s staff and participated in the combat at Bull Run and Antietam in 1862. His star really rose during action at Gettysburg a year later. Some have credited his cavalry escapades with turning the tide of the battle and possibly the tide of the entire war. He even showed up at the surrender of Robert E. Lee to U.S. Grant at Appomattox. All of this combined to create an aura around the formerly floundering young man, and at the ripe old age of 23, George had risen to the rank of brigadier general.
Let’s skip ahead thirteen years to June 25, 1876. Here we find the still hot headed, driven and often flakey cavalryman, now in charge of the 7th Cavalry. Although he was no longer a brigadier general, and was lucky to be a lieutenant colonel, Custer was about to make real history – not necessarily the kind people look forward to making.
Photograph of Custer’s 7th Cavalry as they rode toward disaster.
Just a week or so before the U.S. birthday party – the Centennial – was to kick off in Philadelphia, Custer and his force left Fort Lincoln and rode along the Little Big Horn River. Nine days before the high jinks began with fireworks in Philly, our hero rode along the banks of the Little Big Horn River. His objective was to locate the amassed Cheyenne and Sioux warriors gathered there and keep them from getting away, so that other cavalry forces could circle around and take their village.
Drawing made in 1930 by a survivor, Big Beaver, that shows the village and the approaching troopers.
Some 4,000 warriors thought differently than Custer, and took true guerrilla tactics to defend themselves. Custer, in his own feverish mind, could not wait for reinforcements and assumed a take-no-prisoners attitude.
Portrait of George Custer as Commander of the 7th
Yes, there were other names that are part of the story: Benteen and Reno are the two most obvious. Their side of things are for another day.
An isolated Custer found himself singled out for the total outrage of the Sioux and Cheyenne. Having crossed the Little Big Horn River, the troops were driven back. They took refuge on a small piece or real estate today called ‘Last Stand Hill.’ When Reno and Benteen’s reinforcement attempts proved unsuccessful, the warriors obstructing their efforts were supposedly observed riding with flags taken from Custer and his command. This meant the fight was most likely already over – over so quickly.
To make the story shorter, not only did he get himself killed on the field of battle, known as the Little Big Horn, he also got his two brothers, Boston and Tom, killed. But that wasn’t the end of familial death. John Calhoun, his wife’s brother, and Autie Reed, his young nephew, rode into the valley of death with him. This really was a family affair. To round out the losses on the battlefield, there were five companies of troops, totaling 227, not including the four soon-to-be-dead family members.
- - - - - - -
There have been arguments for generations about possible survivors of the massacre. There have been books written and movies made that offer up tales about survivors. HOWEVER, there really was one true and agreed upon survivor. Here’s his photograph. His name: Camanche.
What happened at ‘Custer’s Last Stand’ will remain one of those historic events that will always continue to spark argument, spark the imagination and continue to remain outside the complete understanding of us.
In an attempt to ‘understand,’ while celebrating the heroic bravery of Custer, Walt Whitman wrote “A Sonnet for Custer.” Here is a copy of the poem in Whitman’s own hand.
Many illustrated versions of the ‘Last Stand,’ and Custer’s heroism, were produced over the decades to follow. Here is one such example (even if the village of tents weren’t there – and Custer’s famous locks had been cut before leaving Ft. Lincoln).
Perhaps the most popular of all illustrations of the “supposed” event was produced by the Anheuser-Busch brewery and could be found in pubs and taverns and bars across North America.
The story (the truth, the fiction, the hoped-for tale) of George Armstrong Custer will continue to be unraveled and/or revealed, as time goes by. These are just some of the facts (not the fictions). Trivial bits of truth, here and there, make the Custer legend more and more attractive.
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
D-Day
How’s Your
D-Day History?
Watching the Hatfields and
the McCoys the other evening on the History Channel, I found myself wondering
about the accuracy of the characters – their clothing, the way the cabins were
furnished, the weapons used, the dialogue. All of us can think of Hollywood
flicks that made for great viewing, yet were slim on accuracy.
D-Day has been the subject
of motion pictures, virtually since the end of World War II. Some were more
accurate than others. Some were dramatically wrong in so many ways. None have
been completely accurate.
Let’s
take a look.
The most recent example of a
great movie, full of drama and action, with a compelling storyline is: Saving
Private Ryan.
Do you recognize this guy?
Well, his name is Sergeant "Fritz" Niland -- a
member of the 101st Airborne's 501st Parachute Infantry Regiment, and was one
of those that made the drop into Normandy on June 6, 1944. He landed southwest
of Carentan in Raffoville, and he was eventually able to make it back to his
unit on his own.
Niland's three brothers
served in other units; Lieutenant Preston Niland served in the 22nd Infantry
Regiment, 4th Infantry Division (died on June 7), Technical Sergeant Robert
Niland was a paratrooper in the 505th Parachute Infantry Regiment, 82nd
Airborne Division (killed on June 6), and Technical Sergeant Edward Niland was
a pilot in the Army Air Force (went MIA).
Niland was the real-life
version of Private Ryan. Unlike the fictional Ryan, there was no need to send
out a rescue mission (led by the like of Tom Hanks) to find him. When a
chaplain of the 501st, Father Francis L. Sampson, learned that two
of Niland's brothers were dead, and that a third was presumed dead, he began
the paperwork necessary to send Niland home – which worked.
What about another popular
D-Day movie: The Longest Day (released October 4, 1962 by 20th Century Fox
and shot in France).
Do you recognize the guy with arm raised?
Well, he isn’t a real
military hero. He’s actor Robert Mitchum and he’s portraying the highest
ranking officer on Omaha Beach on June 6, 1944 – Colonel Norm Cota.
Cota is best known for
personally directing the attack, motivating the shell-shocked, pinned-down
survivors of the beach landing into action, and opening one of the first means
to get off the beach. He supposedly made
two well-known commands (quotes) that day:
* When coming upon the commander of the 5th
Ranger Battalion, Max Schneider, Costa asked: “What outfit is this?” When
some unknown soldier yelled back: "5th Rangers!" Cota is
remembered for screaming: “Well, goddamn it then, Rangers, lead the way!”.
BTW: "Rangers lead the way" became the motto of the 75th Ranger Regiment.
* Mistakenly Cota has been quoted as saying to his troops, "Gentlemen, we are being killed on the beaches. Let us go inland and be killed."
BTW: "Rangers lead the way" became the motto of the 75th Ranger Regiment.
* Mistakenly Cota has been quoted as saying to his troops, "Gentlemen, we are being killed on the beaches. Let us go inland and be killed."
The 1962 film, The
Longest Day, mistakenly portrays Cota giving troops a verbal
kick in the ass, which history shows us was actually the encouragement of
Colonel George A. Taylor. Here’s what was said by actor Robert Mitchem – and
not by the real Col. Cota: "There
are only two kinds of people who are staying on this beach -- those who are
already dead and those that are gonna'die. Now get off your butts, you're the
fight'in 29th!"
- - - - - - - -
Speaking of Hollywood,
there’s another way to look at D-Day and a Hollywood actor.
Do you recognize this guy?
Sure, he’s in uniform, but it isn’t one he wore on
D-Day.
Here is a photo of actor James
Doohan -- known as "Scotty" on Star Trek.
Back on June 6, 1944, Doohan landed in Normandy with
Allied troops. He was a member of the Third Canadian Infantry Division that hit
Juno Beach in the first wave, where he took out a couple of German snipers,
before being wounded in a leg and right hand by a machine gunner. In his
biography, “Beam Me Up Scotty,” he wrote of losing his right middle finger, which
has been mangled in the firefight. His wounds did not remove him from the war.
He was retrained and became an air observation pilot, based out of Holland.
- - - - - - - -
These are just three stories about D-Day and
Hollywood. There are actually many more. Hope you enjoyed these examples.
GT
Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Trifling with Trivia Ain’t Funny
The latest item floundering on top of the trivial garbage heap is a combination of two good video clips and one tiny bit of untrue crap that has been driving friends of mine around the country into perpetuating the falsehood.
What is it? Well… Allow me to present the email, as it has appeared time and time again on my computer screen (disoriented, replete with bad grammar and repetitive). It reads:
- - - - - - - - -
INCREDIBLE. I DIDN'T KNOW TOM HANKS DAD WAS THE LEAD SINGER OF THE DIAMONDS WAY BACK IN 1957!
THEY SOUND EXACTLY THE SAME AS THEY DID!
2 Performances - 47 years apart
FYI, the lead singer of the Diamonds is also the father of TOM HANKS.
If you were alive in 1957, and old enough to enjoy Rock and Roll, you will
probably remember the group, "The Diamonds" who had just launched their
super hit "Little Darlin'." For you that are too young to remember - it was
a time when the performers were happy, enjoying themselves, respecting
their fans, dressed appropriately, and their lyrics could be understood. They
did not feel obligated to scream, eat the microphone, mumble inaudible lyrics
or trash the set.
were requested to perform at Atlantic City ... These links leads to both
performances.
Watch the first one then scroll down for the new one 47 years later.
So, with this illustration in front of us, let’s look at what can result from a poor attempt to play with people’s heads.
Viewing the old clip and comparing it with the same singers nearly 50 years later, is fun stuff (it may not be for everyone). The lead singer, Dave Somerville, is a handsome man – not bad as a kid nor as a Medicare recipient.

On the other hand, what about the “Tom Hanks relationship.” Pure bunk.
What do trivia buffs do, when this kind of crap hits cyberspace? There a couple of choices. One is to ignore it and let it “possibly” go away. My choice was to find some answers and share them with our readers. Here are some things you might find interesting:
Here’s the skinny on Amos Melford Hanks -- Tom’s actual father.
The first source comes from the official birth and death records kept by the state of California. A member of the Lansden family maintains a list at: http://www.thelansdens.com/Ancestors/aqwn260.htm.
Amos Mefford HANKS
BIRTH: California Birth Index
Name: Amos M Hanks
Birth Date: 4 Mar 1924
Gender: Male
Mother's Maiden Name: Ball
Birth County: Glenn
DEATH: California Death Index
Name: Amos Mefford Hanks
Social Security #: 565261539
Sex: MALE
Birth Date: 4 Mar 1924
Birthplace: California
Death Date: 31 Jan 1992
Death Place: Alameda
- - - - - - - -
Will Johnson, a professional genealogist wrote and posted the following article (see: http://sites.google.com/site/countyhistorian/ancestry-of-tom-hanks ):
Amos M Hanks
Amos Mefford "Bud" Hanks was born 2 Mar 1924 in Glenn County, California the son of Ernest Buel Hanks and Gladys Hilda Ball. (Glenn County is the next county south of Tehama County.) Amos enlisted in the Navy on 11 Nov 1942 and was released 9 Feb 1946. He mustered on the ship U.S.S. Doyen in 1945-46, his rating was MoMM1c (Motor Machinist's Mate 1st Class). The action seen by this ship can be seen on it's Wikipedia page at this link. Amos, on the GI Bill took courses at USC and at Berkeley from where he received a B.A. His ambition was to be a writer. Instead he became a chef.

The Daily Review of Hayward reports 17 Dec 1955 that "Chef Amos Hanks" was then working at Oakland's 'Sea Wolf Restaurant' in Jack London Square. (Pictured at left.) He would continue to work as a chef for 35 years. Link to menu, showing food Hanks was cooking at restaurant: http://www.alamedainfo.com/Sea_Wolf_Menu_1954_02.jpg.
With Janet Marylyn Frager he had a son Thomas J Hanks born 9 Jul 1956 in Contra Costa County, California, who would later become a famous actor. That same year an advertisement in the Oakland Tribune mentions "Chef Amos Hanks". The Oakland Tribune 11 Apr 1958 in an advertisement "Cooking on the Square with the Experts" at Breuner's states that they are going to bring you "... an exciting series of cooking demonstrations by the famous chefs of Jack London Square ...[including] Sea Wolf's chef Bud Hanks will show 5 delectable ways to cook Fillet of Sole...."
On 31 May 1959, the Oakland Tribune in an ad for "Kahns 3-day Sunbeam spectacular... Famous chef fixes bouillabaisse - Learn how to mix this delicious Provincial fish stew from Bud Hanks, famous chef at the Sea Wolf Restaurant in Jack London Square. Monday afternoon, June 1st from 3:15 to 4 p.m. in Kahns fourth floor housewares department."
On 21 Apr 1962 the Nevada State Journal reports the divorce decree granted between Amos Hanks and Janet Hanks, and in the same issue the marriage license granted to "Amos M Hanks age 38 and Winifred M Finely age 38, both of Reno". On 26 Jun 1962 the Oakland Tribune, under an article title "Notes From the News of Bay Area Business, Industry" is reporting "Additions to the executive staff of the Hotel Leamington, ... [include] A.M. (Bud) Hanks, formerly at the Sea Wolf Restaurant, executive chef." A picture of the Hotel Leamington from Google street view is below.

His son Tom went to live with his father for a number of years, by high school Tom was living in Oakland apparently with his father. On 19 Oct 1965 the Oakland Tribune reports the final divorce decree between Amos M Hanks and Winifred M.
Amos married on 30 Jul 1966 to Frances Wong Gee who had been born about 1926. They divorced on 30 Oct 1984 in Alameda County. The next year, he is listed at 1812 San Antonio Avenue in Alameda, but in 1987 he is listed living in San Fernando. He died in Alameda County, California 31 Jan 1992, but he is buried in a tiny cemetery in the tiny town of Paskenta, California.
He wrote an unpublished autobiography.
NOW…here is a Guerrilla Trivia question for you:
To which U.S. president does Tom Hanks have a direct lineage?
Answer below our logo…

Answer:
Abraham Lincoln
Explanation:
Abraham Lincoln’s father, Thomas, married a young girl named Nancy Hanks in Kentucky.
Let’s start the answer off with an artist interpretation of what Nancy Hanks Lincoln looked like at the time of her death. She lost her life to milk sickness. She drank milk from a cow that had grazed on white snakeroot, which is poisonous. Nancy was 34 and her son, Abe, was nine.

Tom Hanks’ father was directly related to President Abraham Lincoln through his mother, Nancy Hanks.
- - - - - - - - -
If you have a Guerrilla Trivia-style question that you’d like to challenge our readers with, please send it to: quizmaster@guerrillatrivia.com.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)